Which statement about FIFRA is false?

The statement that state restrictions on pesticides can be more liberal than those of FIFRA is false because FIFRA (the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) establishes a baseline of pesticide regulation that all states must adhere to. While states can impose additional restrictions that are more stringent than federal standards, they cannot have regulations that are more lenient than FIFRA. This ensures a uniform level of safety and efficacy for pesticides used across the country, protecting public health and the environment.

The other statements reflect accurate points about FIFRA. Approved pesticide labels indeed have the force of law, meaning that the use of a pesticide must comply with the instructions and protocols specified on the label. This is crucial for the proper and safe application of these substances. Only registered pesticides can be sold, which ensures that products have been evaluated and approved for safety and effectiveness by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Additionally, all pesticides must meet EPA guidelines to ensure they pose minimal risk when used according to the label.

Thus, understanding the regulatory framework established by FIFRA reveals the importance of adhering to federal standards while recognizing how state regulations can enhance safety measures without relaxing them.